Does Arabs & Muhammad came from Ismail?

Is Arabs Originated from Ismail?

Ishmael studied Arabic from Arabs & married from Arabs(Jurhum), they are Idolaters & Ishmael dissolved with them. This means Arabs where already before Ismail & Abraham. 

Refer- Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 583: "... The child (i.e. Ishmael) grew up and learnt Arabic from them and (his virtues) caused them to love and admire him as he grew up, and when he reached the age of puberty they made him marry a woman from amongst them. ..."

Ibn Ishaq, refers to people who were not descendants of Abraham as Arabs: “‘Ad b. ‘Aus b. Iram b. Sam b. Nuh and Thamud and Jadis the two sons of Abir b. Iram b. Sam b. Nuh and Tasm and Imlaq and Umaym the sons of Lawidh b. Sam b. Nuh are all Arabs.”  ( “The life of Muhammad”, p. 4)

Ibn Ishaq talks of the descendants of Ishmael being a minority spread out among the Arabs

“Then God multiplied the offspring of Ishmael in Mecca and their uncles from Jurhum were rulers of the temple and judges in Mecca.  The sons of Ishmael did not dispute their authority because of their ties of kindred and their respect for the sanctuary lest there should be quarrelling or fighting therein.  When Mecca became too confined for the sons of Ishmael they spread abroad in the land, and whenever they had to fight a people, God gave them the victory through their religion and they subdued them.” (“The life of Muhammad”, p. 46)

Thus we can say that Arabs are not descendants of Ismail, but some arabs can be Ismailites. 

Is Muhammad Genealogy Fabricated?

Muhammad says “Gabriel has informed me that I belong to Mudar.” (Ibn Sa'd, Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, Volume I, p. 4),

It shows proof of Muhammad was not aware of his lineage, as like Jews , saving chronology was not part of culture of Arabs.

Main genealogies of Muhammad - 

Genealogies of Muhammad traced backed in sirats up to Adnan is some what acceptable, because all are saying in common & Islamic sources claim that Adnan was a Ismailite, So here I want to inspect from Adnan to Ismail.  

Syed Yusf   > Adnan <<  <<  <<  Kedar << Isma'il

Ibn Hisham > Adnan << Udad <<  Muqawwam <<  Nahur <<  Tayrah << Ya'rub << Yashjub <<  Nabit << Isma'il

{Another Imam’s    > Adnan << Adad <<  Zayd << Yaqdud << Al Muqawwam << Al Yasa' << Nabit << Kedar << Ismail}

Major Issues

1)     Nabit & Kedar are two different sons of Ishmael.

       Mother line of Muhammad was mentioned in another way- [Aminah - Wahab - Abd Manaf - Zuhrah - Kilab, same as the Kilab in Muhammad's side]- which never going to meet the Nabit & Kedar line which is parallel.

2)     Adnan was lived nearly ~400 BC, Ismail was lived nearly  ~1800 BC, so about 1400 years of black out was just filled with, 1 & 7 names

•  1 from Sayed Yusuf > to Kedar
•  7 from Ibn Hisham (Derived from Ibin Ishaq) > to Elder one Nabit.

So take Ibn Hisham first (who took from of Ibn Ishaq)

So 7 generations for 1400 years means, Only One name for 200 years? Unbelievable!
Usually Arabs marry early , at average age of 25-30 years they will have an offspring, Ishmael lived for 130 years.

At least - an authentic lineage should have minimum 3 for 100 years.

There fore,
14*3 = 42 generation’s minimum should be specified between Adnan & Ismail.

Again at least, 14*2 = 28 should be there (Father line average age of 50)! Else it is difficult to keep up the records of generations to pass down. This makes the authenticity of only 7 names instead of 28 cannot be acceptable.

3)     Ismail settled in Paran according to Bible, also married an Egyptian women. So Elder Sons, Nabit (Kedar too) can never should be in the line of Muhammad.
Why because, Islamic sources provides Ismail married - Ra'la - a Jurhumite & settled in mecca.

According to Life of Muhammad (Sirat by Ibn Ishaq) “Isma'il b. Ibrahim begat twelve sons: Nabit the elder, Qaydhar, Adhbul, Mabsha, Misma,Mashi, Dimma, Adhr, Tayma, Yatur, Nabish, Qaydhuma. Their mother was Ra'la d. Mudad b."Amr al-Jurhumi” (Page 3-4)
Bible associate history, more than the unproved & contradictory history of Islamic sources. So Muslims defending on, Ismail settled in paran & married Egyptians & have offspring  there is by saying “Bible is corrupt”, is just pointless.

Paran: South west of Canaan (Current Israel)

Numbers 13:1-3 "And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, "Send men to spy out the land of Canaan, which I am giving to the children of Israel; from each tribe of their fathers you shall send a man, every one a leader among them." So Moses sent them from the Wilderness of Paran according to the command of the Lord, all of them men who were heads of the children of Israel."

Numbers 13: 25-26 Forty days later, they came back from exploring the land. They came back to Moses, Aaron, and the whole community of Israel at Kadesh in the Desert of Paran.

Here You can see Paran will be around 10-15 days travel 'to' Canaan(Israel).
☞  Can any one travel to Paran ( if it is) in Saudi Arabia from Canaan(Israel) with in 10-15 days? (Dated 1500 BC)

☞   If Not, then Paran & Sinai in Arabian peninsula is another fabrication.

 

5)     Another Imam’s line (3rd) extends to kedar, will increase the head ache of Muslims. Which again proves, ISMAIL is not the FATHER of MUHAMMAD. 

6) Jews authenticated by their 2 types of genealogy [one kept in temple - descending & other kept with them - ascending]. Jews keep genealogy as more important than their lives. This will authenticate them among the part of Israel. 
But Arabs doesn't have any sort of keeping genealogy then how & what is the source for genealogy of Muhammad - which was written by Ishaq?

Conclusion:

So it is crystal clear that Muhammad Genealogy was traced back from Adnan is Just a MYTH or a FABRICATION.

Note:
Above was written based on the, biological father of Muhammad is Abdhullah, but unfortunately, hadits flash light on the Muhammad's birth, leads us to a conclusion that Muhammad's father - Abdhullah bin Abdul-muttalib died 3-4 years before birth of  muhammad. Which makes Muhammad with unknown father. See the video below.